Differentiated Lesson Reflection
Lesson Creation Reflection
Recently I created a detailed lesson for my students,
really focusing on how varied my students are and different ways I could
support them as individual learners. When educators are creating lessons for
their students there is so much to consider: student’s readiness; their cultural
identities and schema; technology that can support; ELL, special needs, and
gifted students; assessment strategies; and many, many more. The following will
describe some of the instructional strategies used, assessments, technology used
and ways that the lesson was differentiated to meet the needs of a diverse
classroom.
This
lesson focuses on my state standard of asking and answering questions about unknown
words in a text. Some instructional strategies I use throughout are as follows:
name sticks; turn and talk; partner work; photo cards and drawn images;
repeated phrases; hand motions; writing / drawing thinking. I chose these
strategies for a variety of reasons. Some encourage engagement of all students
(pulling name sticks) and other appeal to the different learning styles and
readiness of my students. These strategies support students at all levels
because they are supported through questioning techniques which is a low floor,
high ceiling method of allowing access of content to all students. Low floor
high ceiling methods of teaching and activities make material available to all
students, at the most basic level as well as encourage higher leveling thinking
(Manderson, 2016).
One
strategy I use throughout many of my lessons is the use of a Project GLAD
Cognitive Content Dictionary (CCD) chart. A CCD chart is an academic vocabulary
tool used to help students acquire language. It supports all learners,
including ELL and students with special needs. It is formatted in a way where
the students are introduced to a vocabulary term, they make a prediction of its
meaning. Then they are taught directly the meaning of the word along with a
hand gesture or movement. They learn the meaning and gesture as a repeated
phrase. The vocabulary word is then finished up on the chart by being used in a
sentence and having a quick sketch of the word (Olague, 2022). This method of
vocabulary acquisition has been very useful in my classroom and the different
modes of learning it provides access to academic vocabulary to all students.
The assessments I also use are designed for students to
show their level of understanding. They are encouraged to share their thinking
(and use academic vocabulary with sentence stems) during the share where I can
collect formative assessment data on their understanding. Students may share
either verbally or by showing their thinking on their sticky notes. They are
also asked to share their own idea of individual understanding through the thumbs
up, middle, or down method. To support ELL, special needs, early finishers and
gifted students these assessments are done individually with me either before
or after the lesson. Some students will also be allowed to used picture cards
to demonstrate learning.
Technology used in this lesson included a smart TV, iPad,
and a supplemental learning program Waterford. The smart TV is a tool we use
daily in our classroom. The iPads were used so students could access the
Waterford program. That program supports all learners because it generates
lessons according to the readiness of students. I am also able to go in to the
program and assign specific lessons to individual students. It is a resource
that is easily tailored to the individual needs of all students.
References
Manderson. (2016). Low
floor, high ceiling, wide walls in ELA classrooms. Schools & ecosystems. https://schoolecosystem.wordpress.com/2016/12/28/low-floor-high-ceiling-wide-walls-in-ela-classrooms/
Olague, N. (2022) Project glad units that are culturally and
linguistically responsive. Project GLAD.
https://ntcprojectglad.com/2022/08/21/project-glad%e2%al-unitys-that-are-cuulutrally-and-linguistically-responsive/
Waterford.org
Comments
Post a Comment